Living A Life By Kierkegaard And Camus

Living A Life By Kierkegaard And CamusDoes brio stick out any centre? Stay tuned because two philosophers act to answer this question for you and I. Soren Kierkegaard and Albert Camus both(prenominal) examined human live wizardnce, the nitty-gritty of conduct and the uniform struggle to denudation answers in the earthly concern. Kierkegaard, similarly known as the dumbfound of existentialism focused on the Christian doctrine/doctrine in relation to the existence of God. His view on religion signifies his passion for ethics and for human beingnesss to recognize God and workout what is being pre digestd. Camus, who critiqued Kierkegaards authorship, had a disparate view about the meaning of behavior in which God/ corporate trust is non the last. His strong opposition to death is depicted in his writing because if on that point is deportmentspan there is hope. Both writers argued disparately on whether behavior is worth dungeon and the different solutions t hat sewer lead sensation towards determination a meaningful keep. many a nonher(prenominal) top executive ask wherefore the great unwashed exist. I for angiotensin converting enzyme, pull up stakes non deny the fact that I sometimes question my existence. Who be we to determine that manners is nonsensical? If invigoration is vacuous, why do humans work hard to have it off a bequest? Interpretation of meaninglessness of life also depends on the respondents phantasmal upbringing. So who fuck answer my question is it Kierkegaard, Camus or the Universe? Life bottomland provided be meaningless if we presume it meaningless our attitude to life is what makes it meaningless. Stating that life is meaningless because we suffer and die is a subjective statement. Many hatful claim to be enjoying life and a great deal will aim stock-still in their dying beds that they have lived a very ingenious life. Both Kierkegaard and Camus have suffered different explanations on h ow to deal with a meaningless life however, they both have their pros and cons, therefore, no solution be wear out than the other(a) and can non be perfect on its own.What constitutes a meaningful life? What makes life meaningless? It is important for one to exam what life has to offer before making a last on whether it is meaningless or not. thither be times when we tactile property abandoned and offended by the adult male, simply it does not mean that it is the end of our existence even though we feel that counselling. Camuss explanation and example is right because if I belief that life is absurd and not worth the hassle, I would be inclined to assume in a certain way (I will live a life of cargonlessness since I know that I have nix to lose) to make myself happy. Killing oneself is unfruitful because there is no guarantee that there is happiness after life or that life will in conclusion become meaningful. I intrust in living life one day at a time we struggle to ma ke comprehend of the world that it keeps getting difficult as we try. This action often makes us rebel against the world (we basic totallyy give up hope) and face for alternatives to our problem.We live in a constant state of conflict with the world. The meaning of life needs to be understood in order to feel fulfilled by the world. Because we are born and thrown into the world that offers no explanation of existence, we are left to avenge for ourselves. We all have a feeling or vision of what we want the world to look care, but we get disappointed that the world cannot be shaped to our own per countersign liking. Camus compares the human attempt to understand the world but the world itself cannot be understood. The feeling of breached human relationship amongst the world and human beings is what he calls absurd. We can as feel fulfilled when the world has the very(prenominal) opinion as we do. On the contrary, when the world is against us and is on the opposite direction, w e conclude that the world is not worth living. The world can be unreasonable, however, it links humans together, accordingly we long for clarity to the irrational relationship we have with the world.Camus explained three different ways man can live in an absurd world and still find meaning in it the life of Don Juan, the period of play life and the conquering life. The Don Juan life is a care waive life it is a life of here and now, a life with take a hop and no future. The life of Don Juan is the type of life that the majority of cabaret would rather live, including me. I halt with Camus because there are people whose modus vivendi is living in the moment. They do not live to find answers to life but live to satisfy immediate desire. wad living the life of Don are self centered and they depend only on their decision and judgment because they do not put meaning in anything. They strive for self benefit rather than for anything else. This type of life is one that is not guide d by any deterrent example code or conduct. It is a care free life where people are not worried about constant judgment by the society or feelings of guilt for wrong actions. Imagine a world without object lessons or without law I accept a lot of people would find it difficult to cope. Although, the law and morals exist, living the life of Don Juan would pay no consequences. The quantity of life matters in this miscellanea of life because they are conscious and are aware of what they do, but the amounts of fulfillment they get from such(prenominal)(prenominal) action is what counts. How effective are your actions and decisions on earth? If what I do brings me joy and contentment, I will be inclined to do the same thing to continue to get the same joy. However, I believe that at some point, such life will become lonely because everything revolves around you only and change will be difficult.The other way of living is the life of an impostor. Living a life of an actor means tha t one has to literarily put on a different lifestyle each day. The actor strives to live for others and thus represents lives other than his own. Living such a life makes him absurd, a life with diversity and no specific economic consumption. I believe that living a life of an actor is a way of determination oneself and a way of searching for clarity. I also believe that people who live the life of an actor will find life to a greater extent meaningful at some point because they do realize that such life is hopeful that they capability find a life they can identify with. I can see where the life of an actor can be attributed to Camus absurd reasoning. This is because when we continue to live, we have hope that someday something will change or that one decision might lead to a meaningful life. When in doubt and in search of answers to life, we find ourselves contemplating whether to live or to die. When the feeling of emptiness and loneliness engulfs our mind, I think our intelle ct will be to end that suffering and save ourselves the heart ache of a wicked world. However, an actor continues to live and hope for tomorrow.The last way of life as defined by Camus, is the life of a Conquest. The conquest life is directed towards achieving an aim, an aim he knows is unattainable, yet he struggles. People who live this life know full well that the end gist will not be fruitful, yet that struggle gives their life meaning. The general anatomy represents life and being alive is worth more than the struggle. Conqueror are people who are aware of their effectivenesss and limitations, they remain constantly on that strength that is enough for them to survive the world. They are not worried about being the best they are worried about maintaining the achievement they currently have by being consistent in their actions.Kierkegaards view is different from Camus because his view focuses more on religion and on the thinker that Gods existence conquers all problems. He ex pressed this idea through his definition of the knight of faith and his relationship with God. The knight of faith believes in God and that the ultimate meaning of life is established when we develop a relationship with God however, he does violate the moral law for the sake of the higher being. But even when we believe in God, there are times when we become overwhelmed with the emplacement at hand and we feel unfulfilled. However, for Kierkegaard, the knight of faith believes that with God, all things are possible thus when we sacrifice the material things we have and follow God, we are guaranteed greater possibility in life. Kierkegaards beliefs are different from Camus Don Juan because Camus does not believe in God and Dons life is not bound by any good code.His Knight of faith is depicted in the life of Abraham the son of David. Abraham was told by God to sacrifice his only son Isaac he followed through with this action to murder his only son. This action Kierkegaard calls fai th because Abraham was unforced to sacrifice his only beloved son simply because God give tongue to so and this action will make him develop a relationship with God. The knight of faith acts religiously in Gods will and faith becomes the ultimate even though a moral law is being violated. There are individuals whose ultimate goal is to pursue Gods will regardless of what the moral law is the higher moral law is what is of importance to them.Kierkegaard believes that faith is the only meaningful/existential way of life, but if that is the case, Abraham, who is considered the knight of faith, violated the moral law. He violated the moral law because of his will to sacrifice his son just to be closer to God. When we are faced with the decision of the ethical vs. the religious, our love for religion is greater than our love for the ethical. Abraham chose religion because his faith in God was superior to his allegiance to the ethical life. I believe in religion and I am often influence d by it when making decisions, but I have decided to violate any moral law. I counter Kierkegaards belief because by Abraham willing to sacrifice his son, he might be mistaken for a murderer or a believer. slightly might say that he is both, but if you believe that Abraham is a believer, you also believe that it is ok to kill for the sake of God. If we say that he is a murderer, then faith does not exist and the individual does not exist as well. If this is the case, then the ethical way of life (the universal) not the religious is the acceptable way of life.The way we live our life now speaks our feature. In any situation, I believe that I have a purpose in life. The type of life I choose to live, either the life as explained by Camus or by Kierkegaard, defines who I am. This is where I agree with both Camus and Kierkegaards philosophical view of life and human attitude. They are both right when they said attitude shapes ones life. The meaning of life is defined by the behavior an d the attitude we have towards it. But what if the survival of the fittests we make are not good enough? Does that mean that life will be meaningless? No, but if we are not open to change, then we are detain in our own single world of meaninglessness. We have a choice to make every single day we are alive and the kind of attitude we want to embrace for that day. Making a bad decision or living a rouged life will decidedly expose me to many consequences based on my decision. In any apt(p) day on earth, I believe that life accounts for 10% of what happens to me and the other 90% depends on how I react to that situation.I share both Camus and Kierkegaards philosophy of life. The religious life of the Knight of faith is what I practice in my daily life with the exemption of violating the moral law like Abraham did. We all have freedom to make our own life choices, if that choice is the life expound by Camus, we live it with passion and if it is the life described by Kierkegaard, w e also embrace it. Humans have preconceived idea of what they believe to be happy living. Our creator however according to those who believe in God has plans for us. He considers our stay on earth as temporary and so do I. What Camus describes as death is considered transition to fracture places by those that believe in the existence of God. We have only one life to live and I believe in making the world a better place no matter how long it might take.