Jessie Pope Essay Example for Free

Jessie pope EssayJessie pope was a journalist who wrote recruit ment poems for the day-by-day Mail during the low gear World War. The poems she did salvage were positive propaganda poems for the state of contend her objective was to name patriotism in the readers so that the men would join the forces. pope wrote a persuasive poem where she compared state of struggle to a bouncy. This is illustrated in the title Whos for the wager? It shows that her attitude to state of contend was that it was a great big issuance that al portsy whizz and only(a) should take component part in one way or another. The title is a short and punchy heading inviting anyone to answer. This gives the wrong fancy of the war, it is misleading and Jessie Pope either by design or mistakably. Pope was ridiculed for doing this, and if she did relieve the actual earthly concern of war, no one would really command to join, therefore the aim of the poem would not be action and the British soldiery would have no chance of wining in the war.Stanza one begins once more by referring to the war as a gritty for the to a higher place reason and also emphasises that it is the biggest game ever known, war is not a game where you may bounteous points but where it is equally to loose a limb or loose your life. By her saying war it the game, the biggest thats played, Jessie Pope gives a false thought in the rootage line and makes war sound incomparable when clearly it is not. The game is then recurrent to enforce devotion even more. Pope goes on to fee-tail it could be a violent game, likable to the masculine instinct(predicate) whilst there is a comparison betwixt the red crashing game and the red crosscurrent shed in war, she makes it seem like a incase match.Jessie Pope continues to base the poem on a game by stating Wholl trance and tackle the lineage unafraid? This shows that Popes outlook on the war was it was not for cowards but men who leave fight for their republic and protect their families in every way they can. This is compared to a game like rugby, which was a popular brag amongst men at this time, whilst meaning who pull up stakes rise essie Pope was a journalist who wrote recruitment poems for the Daily Mail during the First World War. The poems she did write were positive propaganda poems for the war her objective was to stimulate patriotism in the readers so that the men would join the forces. Pope wrote a persuasive poem where she compared war to a game. This is illustrated in the titleWhos for the game? It shows that her attitude to war was that it was a great big event that everyone should take part in one way or another. The title is a short and punchy question inviting anyone to answer. This gives the wrong impression of the war, it is misleading and Jessie Pope either intentionally or mistakably. Pope was ridiculed for doing this, but if she did write the actual reality of war, no one would really want to join, therefore the aim of the poem would not be fulfilled and the British army would have no chance of wining in the war.Stanza one begins again by referring to the war as a game for the above reason and also emphasises that it is the biggest game ever known, war is not a game where you may loose points but where it is likely to loose a limb or loose your life. By her saying war it the game, the biggest thats played, Jessie Pope gives a false notion in the first line and makes war sound remarkable when clearly it is not. The game is then repeated to enforce excitement even more. Pope goes on to imply it could be a violent game, appealing to the masculine instinct whilst there is a comparison between the red crashing game and the red blood shed in war, she makes it seem like a boxing match.Jessie Pope continues to base the poem on a game by stating Wholl grip and tackle the job unafraid? This shows that Popes outlook on the war was it was not for cowards but men who will fight for their country and protect their families in every way they can. This is compared to a game like rugby, which was a popular sport amongst men at this time, whilst meaning who will rise essie Pope was a journalist who wrote recruitment poems for the Daily Mail during the First World War. The poems she did write were positive propaganda poems for the war her objective was to stimulate patriotism in the readers so that the men would join the forces. Pope wrote a persuasive poem where she compared war to a game. This is illustrated in the title Whos for the game? It shows that her attitude to war was that it was a great big event that everyone should take part in one way or another. The title is a short and punchy question inviting anyone to answer. This gives the wrong impression of the war, it is misleading and Jessie Pope either intentionally or mistakably. Pope was ridiculed for doing this, but if shedid write the actual reality of war, no one would really want to join, therefore the aim of the poem would not be fulfilled and the British army would have no chance of wining in the war.Stanza one begins again by referring to the war as a game for the above reason and also emphasises that it is the biggest game ever known, war is not a game where you may loose points but where it is likely to loose a limb or loose your life. By her saying war it the game, the biggest thats played, Jessie Pope gives a false notion in the first line and makes war sound remarkable when clearly it is not. The game is then repeated to enforce excitement even more. Pope goes on to imply it could be a violent game, appealing to the masculine instinct whilst there is a comparison between the red crashing game and the red blood shed in war, she makes it seem like a boxing match.Jessie Pope continues to base the poem on a game by stating Wholl grip and tackle the job unafraid? This shows that Popes outlook on the war was it was not for cowards but men who will fight for their country and protect their families in every way they can. This is compared to a game like rugby, which was a popular sport amongst men at this time, whilst meaning who will rise essie Pope was a journalist who wrote recruitment poems for the Daily Mail during the First World War. The poems she did write were positive propaganda poems for the war her objective was to stimulate patriotism in the readers so that the men would join the forces. Pope wrote a persuasive poem where she compared war to a game. This is illustrated in the title Whos for the game? It shows that her attitude to war was that it was a great big event that everyone should take part in one way or another. The title is a short and punchy question inviting anyone to answer. This gives the wrong impression of the war, it is misleading and Jessie Pope either intentionally or mistakably. Pope was ridiculed for doing this, but if she did write the actual reality of war, no one would really want to join, therefore the aim of the poem would not be fulfilled and the British army would have no chance of wining in the war.Stanza one begins again by referring to the war as a game for the abovereason and also emphasises that it is the biggest game ever known, war is not a game where you may loose points but where it is likely to loose a limb or loose your life. By her saying war it the game, the biggest thats played, Jessie Pope gives a false notion in the first line and makes war sound remarkable when clearly it is not. The game is then repeated to enforce excitement even more. Pope goes on to imply it could be a violent game, appealing to the masculine instinct whilst there is a comparison between the red crashing game and the red blood shed in war, she makes it seem like a boxing match.Jessie Pope continues to base the poem on a game by stating Wholl grip and tackle the job unafraid? This shows that Popes outlook on the war was it was not for cowards but men who will fight for their country and protect their families in every way they can.