BP case study Essay

1. What are the main ethical issues and dilemma BP faces in this sequel? A project that is on a large scale faces well-nigh issues, including There are concerns about the coating of the personal line of credit and the risks of leakages, in extra in Georgia, where oil spills might significantly impact the countrys strategic water resources in the Bojorni National Park. Concerns were also raised oer the occurrence that the pipeline runs through earthquake zones, which leakages nearly inevitable or could not be avoided. Campaigners have highlighted the prospect of up to 30,000 graciousians along the pipeline being at least temporarily relocated. On the political level, with civil unrest and wars in the region the pipeline passes within only a few miles of the war- torn area of Nagorno Karabakh the project had always been accompanied by considerable fears of terrorist attacks. Also there are countries which the pipelines are supposed to go very high levels of bureaucracy and corru ption, as shown in the various indices.2. How would you estimate BPs approach to the social, environmental and economic impacts of the project for local communities? prise the approach from the perspective of utilitarianism and deontology first. Will the assessment differ from the rights and justice establish perspective? Bp is considered at the time of the pipelines construction to be one of the top or leading companies in embracing sustainability and corporate social obligation (CSR).BP initiatives renewable energy , climate change , gentlemans gentleman rights , and corruption prevention. BP set up a Regional Sustainability Development course of study (RSDP) from early stages of the project in order to to proactively address the social, ethical and environmental issues Environment investment program which aims to address ecological issues. Community investiture Program (CIP) with a budget of about $ 20m, well-nighly address the most social issues during the construction phase. Long term Regional Development porta (RDI) with a budget of approximately U.S. $ 25mn and to accompany the project on a life span of 10 years after its opening. From the point of count on of ethics and utilitarianism, BP has taken initiatives that led to fairly immediate impacts. It proactively addressed the social, ethical and environmental issues. From the perspective of kind-hearted rights and justice, the company was alleged to violate human rights and to engage in corrupt practices.3. This case raises questions about the scope of responsibility for a Western MNC operating in environments with corruption and poor governance. What is your tone on how far a company such as BP in this case should go? Can they really be made answerable for the actions of local officials and governments? Try to base your answer on arguments derived from one or more ethical theories.MNC as BP operate in a globalized universe of discourse where there are different types and forms of govern ment and different levels of inefficiency and corruption involved. It would be foolishly brave to expect that they should be held responsible for what officials and governments, because it can neer be completely within their control. If they do not exploit the potential difference then someone else would. However, they can have a significant tempt on the policy on their fields where they must try to take root an ethical manner.4. What is the appropriate way for BP to respond to its ongoing criticism? plinth your answer on the contemporary ethical theories, in particular integrity ethics, discourse ethics, and postmodern ethics.BP can probably focus on the fact that it has been one of the company around the most socially responsible, implying that he would neer go against the welfare wider not to disturb the balance of the environment. It is also deserving noting that defend the BTC pipeline will generate income for the country, job opportunities and help hear the growing de mand. Being a responsible organization, BP should let people sleep with that it takes all precautionary measures to avoid disasters such as oil spills, contamination of water.